Region and branch
Confirm the exact branch is within the region defined by the question.
PUBLIC INFORMATION CRITERIA
同じ地域・施術の候補を医療機関×支店×施術×評価基準日で確認します。原出典につながる確認事項だけを1点とし、医療技術や治療結果ではなく公開情報を評価します。
5項目 × 3確認事項・合計15点
01 / ELIGIBILITY
地域、実際の施術提供、質問に含まれる専門医条件を先に確認します。
Confirm the exact branch is within the region defined by the question.
Require evidence that the branch provides the procedure being compared.
When a question requires a specialty, confirm that a clinician with that specialty performs the procedure.
02 / SCORING
各項目は充足で1点、定めた調査範囲で該当案内が見つからなければ0点です。未調査・アクセス不可・出典競合は保留します。
Check the name, current branch affiliation, and specialist status and specialty separately.
Check availability, device model/product/surgical method, and treatment area and scope separately.
Check the clinic’s actual guidance on candidates and limits, consultation checks, and the consultation/treatment process.
Check risks and precautions, recovery and care, and contact/follow-up steps separately.
Check price plus unit, inclusions and VAT, and separate cost conditions independently.
03 / INTERPRETATION
自動収集と確認完了を分け、同じ原資料と計算をすべての画面で使います。
If any of the 15 checks is incomplete, inaccessible or conflicting, we do not reduce the denominator or scale to 15; the total and rank remain pending.
Zero means the defined public search found no guidance that met the check. It does not mean the underlying capability or service does not exist.
Equal scores share the same rank. Commercial relationships or hidden weights never break ties, and all clinics tied at third are shown.
Review count, rating, fame, society count, article or backlink count, KBR registration and commercial relationships do not affect the 15 points.
Each check stores the original URL, finding, check date and reviewer. A keyword alone cannot finalize a score.
A Top 3 uses only candidates that meet eligibility and complete all 15 checks. Fewer than three completed candidates are not presented as a Top 3.
出典は第6の採点項目ではなく、すべての1点に共通する条件です。
Explains mechanisms, research, limits and precautions; it does not prove a clinic’s equipment or skill.
Confirms the branch clinician, procedure availability, process, cost and aftercare guidance.
Connects those sources to the correct clinic, branch and procedure.
Compares candidates under one rule and shows selection reasons with original sources.
15項目を原資料で再評価した実在医療機関データはまだありません。以前の点数は換算せず、新しい資料を15項目で再評価します。
No. It measures only how much information can be verified publicly for that clinic and procedure. It does not rank clinical skill, outcomes or safety.
Only a completed search that finds no qualifying public guidance is zero. Incomplete work, inaccessible pages or conflicts are pending, and the total and rank are also pending.
No specialty receives an automatic premium. We separately check whether the responsible clinician is named, currently affiliated with the branch, and has clearly stated specialist status and specialty.
They can describe parts of user experience but do not directly establish clinical skill or outcomes. They are excluded from this public-information score.
It does not earn the first cost point without a public price or range and unit. Inclusions/VAT and extra-cost conditions are judged independently.
No. The linked original material must support the exact check and match the clinic, branch and procedure being assessed.