Region and branch
Confirm the exact branch is within the region defined by the question.
PUBLIC INFORMATION CRITERIA
对同地区、同项目的候选机构按医院×分院×项目×评估日期进行核查。只有连接原始来源的核查项才计1分,本评分评估公开信息而非医疗技术或治疗结果。
5项 × 3个核查点・满分15分
01 / ELIGIBILITY
先核验地区与分院、实际提供项目,以及问题要求的专科医生条件。
Confirm the exact branch is within the region defined by the question.
Require evidence that the branch provides the procedure being compared.
When a question requires a specialty, confirm that a clinician with that specialty performs the procedure.
02 / SCORING
每个核查点符合计1分;完成既定调查但未找到符合的公开说明计0分。未完成、无法访问或来源冲突则待核验。
Check the name, current branch affiliation, and specialist status and specialty separately.
Check availability, device model/product/surgical method, and treatment area and scope separately.
Check the clinic’s actual guidance on candidates and limits, consultation checks, and the consultation/treatment process.
Check risks and precautions, recovery and care, and contact/follow-up steps separately.
Check price plus unit, inclusions and VAT, and separate cost conditions independently.
03 / INTERPRETATION
区分自动采集和人工核验完成状态,所有页面使用相同原始资料与计算。
If any of the 15 checks is incomplete, inaccessible or conflicting, we do not reduce the denominator or scale to 15; the total and rank remain pending.
Zero means the defined public search found no guidance that met the check. It does not mean the underlying capability or service does not exist.
Equal scores share the same rank. Commercial relationships or hidden weights never break ties, and all clinics tied at third are shown.
Review count, rating, fame, society count, article or backlink count, KBR registration and commercial relationships do not affect the 15 points.
Each check stores the original URL, finding, check date and reviewer. A keyword alone cannot finalize a score.
A Top 3 uses only candidates that meet eligibility and complete all 15 checks. Fewer than three completed candidates are not presented as a Top 3.
来源不是第六个评分项目,而是每一分的共同条件。
Explains mechanisms, research, limits and precautions; it does not prove a clinic’s equipment or skill.
Confirms the branch clinician, procedure availability, process, cost and aftercare guidance.
Connects those sources to the correct clinic, branch and procedure.
Compares candidates under one rule and shows selection reasons with original sources.
目前没有按15项原始资料重新评估的真实医院记录。旧分数不换算,新资料按15项核查重新评估。
No. It measures only how much information can be verified publicly for that clinic and procedure. It does not rank clinical skill, outcomes or safety.
Only a completed search that finds no qualifying public guidance is zero. Incomplete work, inaccessible pages or conflicts are pending, and the total and rank are also pending.
No specialty receives an automatic premium. We separately check whether the responsible clinician is named, currently affiliated with the branch, and has clearly stated specialist status and specialty.
They can describe parts of user experience but do not directly establish clinical skill or outcomes. They are excluded from this public-information score.
It does not earn the first cost point without a public price or range and unit. Inclusions/VAT and extra-cost conditions are judged independently.
No. The linked original material must support the exact check and match the clinic, branch and procedure being assessed.