Region and branch
Confirm the exact branch is within the region defined by the question.
PUBLIC INFORMATION CRITERIA
Procedure public-information scoring criteria
We assess candidates for the same area and procedure at the clinic × branch × procedure × evaluation-date level. A check earns one point only when it links to an original source. This score assesses public information, not clinical skill or treatment outcomes.
Procedure public-information score
5 categories × 3 checks · 15 points total
01 / ELIGIBILITY
Eligibility conditions checked before scoring
Region, actual procedure availability and any specialist condition in the question are checked first. A total score cannot override a failed requirement.
Actual procedure availability
Require evidence that the branch provides the procedure being compared.
Question-specific qualification
When a question requires a specialty, confirm that a clinician with that specialty performs the procedure.
02 / SCORING
Five categories, 15 points total
Each check is 1 when met and 0 when the defined search found no qualifying public guidance. Incomplete research, inaccessible pages and conflicting sources remain pending.
Responsible clinician information
Check the name, current branch affiliation, and specialist status and specialty separately.
- The responsible clinician is named1 pt
- The clinician’s current branch affiliation is confirmed1 pt
- Specialist status, specialty and other credentials are confirmed1 pt
최대3pt
Procedure and equipment information
Check availability, device model/product/surgical method, and treatment area and scope separately.
- There is evidence that this branch provides the procedure1 pt
- The device model, product or surgical method is identified1 pt
- The treatment area and scope are stated1 pt
최대3pt
Clinic-specific procedure explanation
Check the clinic’s actual guidance on candidates and limits, consultation checks, and the consultation/treatment process.
- Consultation candidates and limitations are explained1 pt
- What the consultation checks is explained1 pt
- The actual consultation and procedure process is explained1 pt
최대3pt
Precautions and aftercare
Check risks and precautions, recovery and care, and contact/follow-up steps separately.
- Side effects and precautions are provided1 pt
- Recovery and post-procedure care are provided1 pt
- Contact and follow-up steps for a problem are provided1 pt
최대3pt
Cost information
Check price plus unit, inclusions and VAT, and separate cost conditions independently.
- A price or range and its unit are public1 pt
- Included items and VAT status are clear1 pt
- Separate costs and conditions, or no-extra-cost guidance, are clear1 pt
최대3pt
03 / INTERPRETATION
Scoring and candidate-selection rules
These rules separate automated collection from completed review and keep every public result on the same source data and calculation.
01
Any pending check pauses the total
If any of the 15 checks is incomplete, inaccessible or conflicting, we do not reduce the denominator or scale to 15; the total and rank remain pending.
02
Zero does not mean the service is absent
Zero means the defined public search found no guidance that met the check. It does not mean the underlying capability or service does not exist.
03
Ties remain ties
Equal scores share the same rank. Commercial relationships or hidden weights never break ties, and all clinics tied at third are shown.
04
Reviews and fame are excluded
Review count, rating, fame, society count, article or backlink count, KBR registration and commercial relationships do not affect the 15 points.
05
Every final decision links to original material
Each check stores the original URL, finding, check date and reviewer. A keyword alone cannot finalize a score.
06
Only completed eligible candidates are compared
A Top 3 uses only candidates that meet eligibility and complete all 15 checks. Fewer than three completed candidates are not presented as a Top 3.
Roles of sources
Sources are a common condition for every point, not a sixth scoring category.
- Met
- Not met
- Pending
- Inaccessible
- Source conflict
KBR procedure evidence
Explains mechanisms, research, limits and precautions; it does not prove a clinic’s equipment or skill.
Official clinic material
Confirms the branch clinician, procedure availability, process, cost and aftercare guidance.
KBR clinic-procedure record
Connects those sources to the correct clinic, branch and procedure.
Gangnam Beauty Guide
Compares candidates under one rule and shows selection reasons with original sources.
No verified clinic score is published yet
No real clinic assessment is published yet. Earlier scores are not converted; new evidence is assessed against all 15 source-backed checks.
Scoring FAQ
Does a high public-information score mean better clinical care?
No. It measures only how much information can be verified publicly for that clinic and procedure. It does not rank clinical skill, outcomes or safety.
Is information we could not verify scored as zero?
Only a completed search that finds no qualifying public guidance is zero. Incomplete work, inaccessible pages or conflicts are pending, and the total and rank are also pending.
Does any specialist automatically receive more points?
No specialty receives an automatic premium. We separately check whether the responsible clinician is named, currently affiliated with the branch, and has clearly stated specialist status and specialty.
Why are review counts and ratings excluded?
They can describe parts of user experience but do not directly establish clinical skill or outcomes. They are excluded from this public-information score.
Can “price after consultation” earn a cost point?
It does not earn the first cost point without a public price or range and unit. Inclusions/VAT and extra-cost conditions are judged independently.
Does a KBR link itself earn a point?
No. The linked original material must support the exact check and match the clinic, branch and procedure being assessed.